CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold IPknot
MCC 0.680 > 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095 > 0.730 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.671 > 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.689 < 0.695
Total TP 1135 > 1070
Total TN 948883 < 948991
Total FP 707 > 668
Total FP CONTRA 137 > 121
Total FP INCONS 375 > 348
Total FP COMP 195 < 199
Total FN 556 < 621
P-value 5.84585956207e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and IPknot).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1135
Total TN 948883
Total FP 707
Total FP CONTRA 137
Total FP INCONS 375
Total FP COMP 195
Total FN 556
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J2C_O - 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 3946 4 0 0 4 0
3J2C_M - 0.97 0.97 0.98 93 39830 38 0 2 36 3
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.10 5 8255 44 20 24 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.23 0.23 81 420993 296 62 216 18 265
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1070
Total TN 948991
Total FP 668
Total FP CONTRA 121
Total FP INCONS 348
Total FP COMP 199
Total FN 621
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.730 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.86 0.89 25 2412 9 0 3 6 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_h - 0.90 0.81 1.00 26 2114 2 0 0 2 6
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 512 7 1 6 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_2 0.75 0.74 0.76 305 421966 159 17 80 62 107
3J2C_O - 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 3948 4 0 0 4 2
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.74 0.71 71 39825 58 13 16 29 25
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 9 0 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.89 0.91 0.87 41 6460 18 5 1 12 4
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8256 53 19 29 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
3ZEX_B - 0.33 0.27 0.40 95 421115 160 26 116 18 251
3ZEX_H - 0.28 0.37 0.22 7 3593 25 15 10 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.49 0.57 0.44 4 211 6 0 5 1 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.