CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MCFold
MCC 0.718 > 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.713 ± 0.100 > 0.562 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.700 > 0.576
Positive Predictive Value 0.743 > 0.519
Total TP 605 > 498
Total TN 65972 > 65826
Total FP 327 < 620
Total FP CONTRA 73 < 119
Total FP INCONS 136 < 343
Total FP COMP 118 < 158
Total FN 259 < 366
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 605
Total TN 65972
Total FP 327
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 136
Total FP COMP 118
Total FN 259
Total Scores
MCC 0.718
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.713 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.743
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 422 0 0 0 0 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 530 14 3 11 0 12
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_7 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2711 2 0 0 2 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3J3F_7 0.96 0.92 1.00 33 2901 2 0 0 2 3
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 6 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 608 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 498
Total TN 65826
Total FP 620
Total FP CONTRA 119
Total FP INCONS 343
Total FP COMP 158
Total FN 366
Total Scores
MCC 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.562 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.576
Positive Predictive Value 0.519
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 11 0 0 11 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 3 0 0 3 0
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 422 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 2 0 0 2 0
2M58_A - 0.22 0.25 0.23 3 531 13 1 9 3 9
3J0L_h - 0.98 0.97 1.00 31 2109 2 0 0 2 1
3J0L_1 - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 472 5 0 1 4 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 6 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 170 7 4 2 1 2
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.27 0.25 7 2222 29 4 17 8 19
3J16_L 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1136 12 4 7 1 9
3J20_0 0.66 0.71 0.63 15 1195 11 3 6 2 6
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 15 1 8 6 7
3J3D_C 0.54 0.63 0.48 12 943 13 4 9 0 7
3J3E_7 0.55 0.56 0.54 19 2706 23 1 15 7 15
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3J3F_7 0.88 0.89 0.86 32 2897 9 1 4 4 4
3SN2_B 0.58 0.58 0.64 7 143 4 0 4 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 88 4 0 4 0 5
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 102 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.32 0.16 6 3588 36 15 16 5 13
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 909 22 0 5 17 4
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
3ZEX_D 0.23 0.26 0.23 9 2756 33 6 25 2 26
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6493 14 6 8 0 45
3ZND_W 0.23 0.38 0.15 3 1171 26 9 8 9 5
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 8 0 6 2 4
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.92 0.92 11 238 1 0 1 0 1
4FRG_B 0.35 0.38 0.35 9 1176 17 3 14 0 15
4FRN_A 0.09 0.11 0.10 3 1818 28 2 25 1 25
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.74 0.75 0.75 18 1058 7 1 5 1 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.29 0.23 5 600 17 0 17 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.