CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.781 > 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.160 > 0.646 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.731 > 0.627
Positive Predictive Value 0.840 > 0.723
Total TP 204 > 175
Total TN 24164 < 24165
Total FP 74 < 109
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 19
Total FP INCONS 26 < 48
Total FP COMP 35 < 42
Total FN 75 < 104
P-value 9.07229227445e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 204
Total TN 24164
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 75
Total Scores
MCC 0.781
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.731
Positive Predictive Value 0.840
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 175
Total TN 24165
Total FP 109
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.627
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.67 0.65 0.71 22 2989 11 3 6 2 12
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.41 9 5352 15 3 10 2 20
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.