CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.830 > 0.775
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.763 ± 0.115 > 0.679 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.800 > 0.740
Positive Predictive Value 0.861 > 0.813
Total TP 646 > 597
Total TN 452842 < 452858
Total FP 192 < 276
Total FP CONTRA 34 > 31
Total FP INCONS 70 < 106
Total FP COMP 88 < 139
Total FN 161 < 210
P-value 1.43692248862e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 646
Total TN 452842
Total FP 192
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.830
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.763 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.800
Positive Predictive Value 0.861
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 597
Total TN 452858
Total FP 276
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 139
Total FN 210
Total Scores
MCC 0.775
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.740
Positive Predictive Value 0.813
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J20_2 0.83 0.82 0.84 337 421969 147 14 48 85 75
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 1 5 5 8
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 21 3 6 12 20
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14
4FRN_A 0.70 0.68 0.73 19 1822 7 3 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.