CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.781 > 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.160 > 0.442 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.731 > 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.840 > 0.741
Total TP 204 > 120
Total TN 24164 < 24245
Total FP 74 > 54
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 5
Total FP INCONS 26 < 37
Total FP COMP 35 > 12
Total FN 75 < 159
P-value 1.16841705202e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 204
Total TN 24164
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 75
Total Scores
MCC 0.781
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.731
Positive Predictive Value 0.840
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 24245
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 159
Total Scores
MCC 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.442 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.741
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 0.26 0.25 0.29 5 1095 12 1 11 0 15
3J2L_3 0.42 0.38 0.48 13 2993 16 2 12 2 21
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 7 0 2 5 3
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.