CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.820 > 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.794 ± 0.161 > 0.627 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.768 > 0.644
Positive Predictive Value 0.881 > 0.679
Total TP 192 > 161
Total TN 18815 > 18796
Total FP 51 < 99
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 17
Total FP INCONS 17 < 59
Total FP COMP 25 > 23
Total FN 58 < 89
P-value 1.20383511129e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 192
Total TN 18815
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 58
Total Scores
MCC 0.820
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.794 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.768
Positive Predictive Value 0.881
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 161
Total TN 18796
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 89
Total Scores
MCC 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.644
Positive Predictive Value 0.679
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.