CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.605 > 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.155 > 0.474 ± 0.190
Sensitivity 0.559 > 0.313
Positive Predictive Value 0.663 < 0.717
Total TP 118 > 66
Total TN 17684 < 17770
Total FP 85 > 27
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 1
Total FP INCONS 42 > 25
Total FP COMP 25 > 1
Total FN 93 < 145
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 17684
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 66
Total TN 17770
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.474 ± 0.190
Sensitivity 0.313
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3W3S_B 0.45 0.27 0.75 9 1977 3 0 3 0 24
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.24 1.00 7 5367 0 0 0 0 22
4A1C_2 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4509 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 3 1190 9 0 9 0 21
4FRN_A 0.66 0.50 0.88 14 1832 2 1 1 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.