Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of ContextFold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & PETfold_2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
ContextFold |
|
PETfold_2.0(seed) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.938 |
>
|
0.866 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.940
±
0.524
|
>
|
0.868
±
0.471
|
| Sensitivity |
0.914 |
>
|
0.845 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.964 |
>
|
0.891 |
| Total TP |
53 |
>
|
49 |
| Total TN |
4279 |
=
|
4279 |
| Total FP |
9 |
<
|
19 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
<
|
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
1 |
<
|
4 |
| Total FP COMP |
7 |
<
|
13 |
| Total FN |
5 |
<
|
9 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of ContextFold and PETfold_2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for ContextFold
and PETfold_2.0(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and PETfold_2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for ContextFold
and PETfold_2.0(seed)).
Performance of ContextFold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
53 |
| Total TN |
4279 |
| Total FP |
9 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
1 |
| Total FP COMP |
7 |
| Total FN |
5 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.938 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.940
±
0.524
|
| Sensitivity |
0.914 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.964 |
| Nr of predictions |
2 |
Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
49 |
| Total TN |
4279 |
| Total FP |
19 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
4 |
| Total FP COMP |
13 |
| Total FN |
9 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.866 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.868
±
0.471
|
| Sensitivity |
0.845 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.891 |
| Nr of predictions |
2 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
