CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.760 > 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.097 > 0.634 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.742 > 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.784 > 0.608
Total TP 692 > 522
Total TN 105927 < 105952
Total FP 323 < 429
Total FP CONTRA 60 < 114
Total FP INCONS 131 < 222
Total FP COMP 132 > 93
Total FN 241 < 411
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 692
Total TN 105927
Total FP 323
Total FP CONTRA 60
Total FP INCONS 131
Total FP COMP 132
Total FN 241
Total Scores
MCC 0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.742
Positive Predictive Value 0.784
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2C_M - 0.97 0.97 0.98 93 39830 38 0 2 36 3
3J2C_O - 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 3946 4 0 0 4 0
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.10 5 8255 44 20 24 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 522
Total TN 105952
Total FP 429
Total FP CONTRA 114
Total FP INCONS 222
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 411
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.608
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 2412 13 1 7 5 9
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2119 0 0 0 0 11
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J2C_M - 0.46 0.49 0.44 47 39819 77 22 37 18 49
3J2C_O - 0.72 0.68 0.76 28 3950 13 2 7 4 13
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6507 0 0 0 0 45
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8254 55 20 30 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3592 26 16 10 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 239 11 0 11 0 12
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.