CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.781 > 0.690
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.160 > 0.695 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.731 > 0.616
Positive Predictive Value 0.840 > 0.778
Total TP 204 > 172
Total TN 24164 < 24186
Total FP 74 < 76
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 10
Total FP INCONS 26 < 39
Total FP COMP 35 > 27
Total FN 75 < 107
P-value 1.06761512825e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 204
Total TN 24164
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 75
Total Scores
MCC 0.781
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.731
Positive Predictive Value 0.840
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 172
Total TN 24186
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.690
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.695 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.616
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.56 0.50 0.63 17 2993 12 3 7 2 17
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
3ZEX_D 0.83 0.69 1.00 24 2772 1 0 0 1 11
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.64 0.54 0.76 13 1185 4 0 4 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.