CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.683 > 0.418
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.724 ± 0.088 > 0.515 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.677 > 0.428
Positive Predictive Value 0.691 > 0.410
Total TP 1319 > 835
Total TN 970979 > 970849
Total FP 827 < 1426
Total FP CONTRA 173 < 324
Total FP INCONS 416 < 879
Total FP COMP 238 > 223
Total FN 630 < 1114
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1319
Total TN 970979
Total FP 827
Total FP CONTRA 173
Total FP INCONS 416
Total FP COMP 238
Total FN 630
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.724 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.677
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 422 0 0 0 0 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 530 14 3 11 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2C_M - 0.97 0.97 0.98 93 39830 38 0 2 36 3
3J2C_O - 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 3946 4 0 0 4 0
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3E_7 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2711 2 0 0 2 4
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3J3F_7 0.96 0.92 1.00 33 2901 2 0 0 2 3
3J3V_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 26 2630 7 0 0 7 1
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W1K_J 0.90 0.87 0.93 27 1649 2 1 1 0 4
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.23 0.23 81 420993 296 62 216 18 265
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.10 5 8255 44 20 24 0 29
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 6 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 608 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 835
Total TN 970849
Total FP 1426
Total FP CONTRA 324
Total FP INCONS 879
Total FP COMP 223
Total FN 1114
Total Scores
MCC 0.418
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.428
Positive Predictive Value 0.410
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 176 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.88 23 2414 11 0 3 8 6
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 423 0 0 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.48 0.45 0.56 5 198 5 0 4 1 6
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
3J0L_2 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 4 2223 26 4 19 3 22
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J0L_h - 0.47 0.41 0.57 13 2117 12 1 9 2 19
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_2 0.55 0.55 0.56 228 421959 243 27 154 62 184
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.21 0.25 0.19 24 39797 113 35 69 9 72
3J2C_O - 0.41 0.44 0.40 18 3942 30 7 20 3 23
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3W1K_J 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 1650 5 0 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_H - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3593 33 17 15 1 19
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 17 0 4 13 4
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZEX_B - 0.18 0.19 0.17 65 420964 343 98 225 20 281
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8244 60 23 37 0 34
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.20 0.21 9 6465 37 13 20 4 36
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 213 7 4 3 0 7
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FNJ_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 243 7 0 7 0 12
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.