CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.733 > 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.160 > 0.552 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.715 > 0.539
Positive Predictive Value 0.757 > 0.660
Total TP 293 > 221
Total TN 39357 < 39409
Total FP 165 > 159
Total FP CONTRA 43 > 36
Total FP INCONS 51 < 78
Total FP COMP 71 > 45
Total FN 117 < 189
P-value 2.71568867205e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 293
Total TN 39357
Total FP 165
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 71
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.715
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_7 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2711 2 0 0 2 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3J3F_7 0.96 0.92 1.00 33 2901 2 0 0 2 3
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 6 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 221
Total TN 39409
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 189
Total Scores
MCC 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.552 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.539
Positive Predictive Value 0.660
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.