CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Sfold
MCC 0.680 > 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095 > 0.692 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.671 > 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.689 > 0.589
Total TP 1135 > 1007
Total TN 948883 > 948821
Total FP 707 < 941
Total FP CONTRA 137 < 183
Total FP INCONS 375 < 519
Total FP COMP 195 < 239
Total FN 556 < 684
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Sfold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1135
Total TN 948883
Total FP 707
Total FP CONTRA 137
Total FP INCONS 375
Total FP COMP 195
Total FN 556
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J2C_O - 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 3946 4 0 0 4 0
3J2C_M - 0.97 0.97 0.98 93 39830 38 0 2 36 3
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.10 5 8255 44 20 24 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.23 0.23 81 420993 296 62 216 18 265
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1007
Total TN 948821
Total FP 941
Total FP CONTRA 183
Total FP INCONS 519
Total FP COMP 239
Total FN 684
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.692 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.589
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 26 2414 6 0 0 6 3
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 4 1 1 2 6
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 5 1 2 2 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 516 3 1 2 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J0L_2 - 0.44 0.42 0.48 11 2227 19 0 12 7 15
3J16_L 0.34 0.33 0.37 7 1140 12 0 12 0 14
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_2 0.57 0.58 0.56 240 421940 241 31 157 53 172
3J2C_O - 0.76 0.66 0.87 27 3956 9 2 2 5 14
3J2C_M - 0.85 0.85 0.85 82 39828 51 6 9 36 14
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.60 0.50 0.73 8 1282 7 3 0 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.63 0.64 0.64 21 1956 13 4 8 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 7 0 0 7 4
3ZEX_G - 0.99 0.98 1.00 44 6463 15 0 0 15 1
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8250 56 20 34 2 34
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.80 0.90 28 2765 8 0 3 5 7
3ZEX_B - 0.37 0.39 0.35 136 420960 296 65 191 40 210
3ZEX_H - 0.26 0.37 0.19 7 3589 29 18 11 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.34 0.50 10 5354 27 2 8 17 19
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.37 0.14 1.00 1 219 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.67 0.58 0.78 14 1184 4 3 1 0 10
4FRN_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 16 1830 2 2 0 0 12
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.