CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold UNAFold
MCC 0.680 > 0.562
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095 > 0.666 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.671 > 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.689 > 0.540
Total TP 1135 > 994
Total TN 948883 > 948688
Total FP 707 < 1091
Total FP CONTRA 137 < 223
Total FP INCONS 375 < 625
Total FP COMP 195 < 243
Total FN 556 < 697
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1135
Total TN 948883
Total FP 707
Total FP CONTRA 137
Total FP INCONS 375
Total FP COMP 195
Total FN 556
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.746 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 124 3 0 0 3 1
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.66 0.76 19 2415 12 0 6 6 10
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_h - 0.95 0.91 1.00 29 2111 2 0 0 2 3
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 5 0 2 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 3 0 2 1 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_2 - 0.80 0.77 0.83 20 2226 11 0 4 7 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J2C_O - 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 3946 4 0 0 4 0
3J2C_M - 0.97 0.97 0.98 93 39830 38 0 2 36 3
3J2L_3 0.95 0.91 1.00 31 2989 4 0 0 4 3
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 16 0 4 12 4
3ZEX_G - 0.32 0.31 0.33 14 6465 35 10 18 7 31
3ZEX_E - 0.12 0.15 0.10 5 8255 44 20 24 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2766 4 0 0 4 5
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.23 0.23 81 420993 296 62 216 18 265
3ZEX_H - 0.29 0.37 0.24 7 3596 27 7 15 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4A1C_3 0.96 0.92 1.00 34 2729 1 0 0 1 3
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 994
Total TN 948688
Total FP 1091
Total FP CONTRA 223
Total FP INCONS 625
Total FP COMP 243
Total FN 697
Total Scores
MCC 0.562
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.540
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 6 0 0 6 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 4 1 1 2 6
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 4 0 2 2 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - 0.66 0.70 0.64 7 508 5 2 2 1 3
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J0L_2 - 0.30 0.31 0.31 8 2224 25 2 16 7 18
3J16_L 0.31 0.33 0.30 7 1136 16 3 13 0 14
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_2 0.57 0.58 0.55 240 421931 250 36 161 53 172
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.61 0.60 25 3945 22 7 10 5 16
3J2C_M - 0.75 0.80 0.71 77 39816 68 13 19 36 19
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.49 0.50 0.50 8 1277 15 0 8 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 908 11 2 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 17 0 0 17 3
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8255 54 17 32 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 6 0 2 4 6
3ZEX_B - 0.36 0.40 0.33 138 420935 317 72 207 38 208
3ZEX_H - 0.25 0.37 0.18 7 3586 32 20 12 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.48 0.46 0.52 13 1823 12 2 10 0 15
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.