CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.750 > 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.769 ± 0.100 > 0.592 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.750 > 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.758 < 0.855
Total TP 528 > 294
Total TN 49263 < 49616
Total FP 241 > 63
Total FP CONTRA 59 > 5
Total FP INCONS 110 > 45
Total FP COMP 72 > 13
Total FN 176 < 410
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 528
Total TN 49263
Total FP 241
Total FP CONTRA 59
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 72
Total FN 176
Total Scores
MCC 0.750
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.769 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.750
Positive Predictive Value 0.758
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.12 4 2012 30 2 27 1 31
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.39 0.58 0.27 7 4730 35 13 6 16 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2243 9 1 3 5 6
3O58_3 0.32 0.36 0.29 8 4736 21 7 13 1 14
3PDR_A 0.83 0.86 0.80 43 4786 13 5 6 2 7
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.34 0.37 10 5347 23 4 13 6 19
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.73 0.71 0.77 17 1180 5 3 2 0 7
4FRN_A 0.74 0.71 0.77 20 1822 6 1 5 0 8

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 294
Total TN 49616
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 410
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.592 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.855
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.54 0.30 1.00 3 171 0 0 0 0 7
2KE6_A 0.67 0.56 0.83 10 455 2 0 2 0 8
2KUR_A 0.65 0.53 0.83 10 455 2 0 2 0 9
2KUU_A 0.67 0.56 0.83 10 435 2 0 2 0 8
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2L1F_A 0.83 0.78 0.90 18 743 2 0 2 0 5
2L1F_B 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 771 2 0 2 0 6
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 2 0 0 2 7
2XXA_G 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 2039 0 0 0 0 29
3A3A_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 12 1488 0 0 0 0 18
3GX2_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 14 1435 1 0 0 1 14
3IVN_B 0.62 0.52 0.75 12 887 4 2 2 0 11
3JYX_4 0.50 0.25 1.00 3 4753 4 0 0 4 9
3LA5_A 0.67 0.56 0.82 14 937 3 1 2 0 11
3NPB_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 13 2265 2 0 0 2 24
3O58_3 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 4758 1 0 0 1 16
3PDR_A 0.53 0.28 1.00 14 4826 0 0 0 0 36
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
3W3S_B 0.45 0.27 0.75 9 1977 3 0 3 0 24
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.24 1.00 7 5367 0 0 0 0 22
4A1C_2 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4509 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 3 1190 9 0 9 0 21
4FRN_A 0.66 0.50 0.88 14 1832 2 1 1 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.