CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.664 > 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.096 > 0.634 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.684 > 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.651 > 0.608
Total TP 638 > 522
Total TN 105830 < 105952
Total FP 467 > 429
Total FP CONTRA 108 < 114
Total FP INCONS 234 > 222
Total FP COMP 125 > 93
Total FN 295 < 411
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 638
Total TN 105830
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 108
Total FP INCONS 234
Total FP COMP 125
Total FN 295
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.719 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.651
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.90 0.87 26 2410 11 0 4 7 3
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 1 0 0 1 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 512 7 1 6 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.88 0.88 28 2108 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 3 0 1 2 3
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.31 0.28 8 2221 26 2 19 5 18
3J16_L 0.55 0.57 0.55 12 1137 10 3 7 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 5 0 0 5 0
3J20_0 0.53 0.57 0.50 12 1195 13 3 9 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.57 0.63 0.52 60 39809 77 21 35 21 36
3J2C_O - 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 3947 7 0 1 6 2
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 16 1 9 6 8
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
3UZL_B 0.90 0.88 0.93 14 1278 8 0 1 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 9 0 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.35 0.38 0.34 17 6457 42 9 24 9 28
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8251 58 20 33 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
3ZEX_H - 0.24 0.37 0.17 7 3583 35 22 13 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.34 0.37 10 5347 23 4 13 6 19
4A1C_3 0.81 0.81 0.81 30 2726 10 0 7 3 7
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ATO_G - 0.52 0.57 0.50 4 212 4 0 4 0 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.73 0.71 0.77 17 1180 5 3 2 0 7
4FRN_A 0.74 0.71 0.77 20 1822 6 1 5 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 522
Total TN 105952
Total FP 429
Total FP CONTRA 114
Total FP INCONS 222
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 411
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.608
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 2412 13 1 7 5 9
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2119 0 0 0 0 11
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J2C_M - 0.46 0.49 0.44 47 39819 77 22 37 18 49
3J2C_O - 0.72 0.68 0.76 28 3950 13 2 7 4 13
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6507 0 0 0 0 45
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8254 55 20 30 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3592 26 16 10 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 239 11 0 11 0 12
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.