CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Cylofold		MCFold
MCC	0.739	>	0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.753 ± 0.064	>	0.640 ± 0.086
Sensitivity	0.720	>	0.665
Positive Predictive Value	0.767	>	0.612
Total TP	859	>	793
Total TN	65256	>	65080
Total FP	347	<	656
Total FP CONTRA	77	<	97
Total FP INCONS	184	<	406
Total FP COMP	86	<	153
Total FN	334	<	400
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Cylofold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	859
Total TN	65256
Total FP	347
Total FP CONTRA	77
Total FP INCONS	184
Total FP COMP	86
Total FN	334

Total Scores
MCC	0.739
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.753 ± 0.064
Sensitivity	0.720
Positive Predictive Value	0.767
Nr of predictions	69

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	355	0	0	0	0	0
2KXM_A	-	0.78	0.63	1.00	5	144	0	0	0	0	3
2KZL_A	-	0.83	0.69	1.00	9	511	1	0	0	1	4
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.87	1.00	20	743	0	0	0	0	3
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	770	0	0	0	0	3
2L2K_A	-	0.87	0.76	1.00	13	336	0	0	0	0	4
2L3C_B	-	0.84	0.71	1.00	10	229	0	0	0	0	4
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.90	1.00	27	958	0	0	0	0	3
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LA5_A	-	0.77	0.71	0.83	5	269	1	0	1	0	2
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.61	0.69	11	512	5	1	4	0	7
2LDL_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	6	134	0	0	0	0	3
2LDT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	151	0	0	0	0	0
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.56	0.55	0.57	16	2412	13	4	8	1	13
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
2M58_A	-	0.60	0.58	0.64	7	533	4	1	3	0	5
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.71	1.00	5	70	0	0	0	0	2
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.55	0.32	6	1816	25	9	4	12	5
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.95	0.83	20	1105	5	4	0	1	1
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.10	0.11	0.11	4	2009	32	2	30	0	31
2Y9C_V	-	0.72	0.72	0.72	13	888	8	0	5	3	5
2YIE_X	-	0.43	0.57	0.33	4	532	10	2	6	2	3
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	591	11	5	6	0	8
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.75	0.79	15	1108	7	0	4	3	5
3AM1_B	-	0.83	0.76	0.92	22	1442	2	0	2	0	7
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.79	0.75	15	1137	8	0	5	3	4
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.83	0.88	29	2607	7	0	4	3	6
3J0L_7	-	0.41	0.50	0.36	5	505	10	3	6	1	5
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.46	0.52	12	2227	18	0	11	7	14
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	174	4	0	2	2	2
3J0L_h	-	0.55	0.50	0.62	16	2114	10	2	8	0	16
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	3	0	1	2	5
3J0L_a	-	0.17	0.18	0.20	2	401	9	3	5	1	9
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.81	1.00	17	1142	0	0	0	0	4
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	3	3	1	5
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.68	0.74	23	2989	11	0	8	3	11
3NDB_M	-	0.68	0.64	0.74	28	3676	14	2	8	4	16
3NKB_B	-	0.46	0.42	0.53	8	720	7	0	7	0	11
3NMU_E	-	0.28	0.33	0.25	1	212	6	1	2	3	2
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.50	0.35	11	4733	30	9	11	10	11
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.84	0.96	26	2727	3	0	1	2	5
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	215	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	204	0	0	0	0	0
3P22_G	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	301	0	0	0	0	0
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.78	0.95	39	4799	4	1	1	2	11
3R4F_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	22	884	1	0	0	1	0
3R9X_C	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	221	2	0	0	2	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	20	1506	7	2	5	0	9
3SIU_F	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	6	139	0	0	0	0	2
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.42	1.00	5	149	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.69	0.71	24	2762	11	5	5	1	11
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.75	0.43	6	1177	18	5	3	10	2
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.88	1.00	0.78	7	211	2	2	0	0	0
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	457	0	0	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.97	1.00	0.94	15	480	1	1	0	0	0
4FNJ_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	8	242	0	0	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	1181	0	0	0	0	3
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.18	0.31	5	1832	11	7	4	0	23
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	793
Total TN	65080
Total FP	656
Total FP CONTRA	97
Total FP INCONS	406
Total FP COMP	153
Total FN	400

Total Scores
MCC	0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.640 ± 0.086
Sensitivity	0.665
Positive Predictive Value	0.612
Nr of predictions	69

^top

2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	355	0	0	0	0	0
2KXM_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	141	1	0	0	1	0
2KZL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	507	5	0	0	5	0
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.78	0.82	18	741	4	0	4	0	5
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.79	0.83	19	768	4	0	4	0	5
2L2K_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	17	332	1	0	0	1	0
2L3C_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	225	1	0	0	1	0
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	2	0	0	2	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	30	955	0	0	0	0	0
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LA5_A	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	265	10	0	10	0	7
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.44	0.47	8	511	10	0	9	1	10
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	152	0	0	0	0	1
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	29	2411	11	0	0	11	0
2LWK_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	196	2	0	0	2	0
2M58_A	-	0.22	0.25	0.23	3	531	13	1	9	3	9
2RRC_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	7	68	1	0	0	1	0
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.27	0.16	3	1816	30	4	12	14	8
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.43	0.38	9	1105	18	2	13	3	12
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.26	0.24	9	2007	30	1	28	1	26
2Y9C_V	-	0.65	0.72	0.59	13	884	12	1	8	3	5
2YIE_X	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	535	15	1	8	6	7
2YIE_Z	-	0.53	0.63	0.45	5	591	8	2	4	2	3
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.50	0.43	10	1104	16	5	8	3	10
3AM1_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	29	1437	1	0	0	1	0
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.58	0.44	11	1132	15	4	10	1	8
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.94	0.89	33	2603	10	0	4	6	2
3J0L_7	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	504	15	6	9	0	10
3J0L_2	-	0.25	0.27	0.25	7	2222	29	4	17	8	19
3J0L_g	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	170	7	4	2	1	2
3J0L_h	-	0.98	0.97	1.00	31	2109	2	0	0	2	1
3J0L_1	-	0.88	0.85	0.92	11	472	5	0	1	4	2
3J0L_a	-	0.14	0.18	0.15	2	398	13	1	10	2	9
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.57	0.52	12	1136	12	4	7	1	9
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.71	0.63	15	1195	11	3	6	2	6
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.79	0.75	27	2984	15	1	8	6	7
3NDB_M	-	0.29	0.30	0.30	13	3671	35	1	29	5	31
3NKB_B	-	0.68	0.74	0.64	14	713	8	2	6	0	5
3NMU_E	-	0.51	0.67	0.40	2	211	8	1	2	5	1
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.28	0.36	0.22	8	4727	39	14	15	10	14
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.25	0.29	0.23	9	2715	31	6	24	1	22
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	215	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	204	0	0	0	0	0
3P22_G	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	301	1	0	0	1	0
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.80	0.77	40	4788	14	5	7	2	10
3R4F_A	-	0.95	0.95	0.95	21	884	4	0	1	3	1
3R9X_C	-	0.87	0.88	0.88	7	221	5	0	1	4	1
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.88	0.91	21	843	3	0	2	1	3
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.45	0.43	13	1503	17	1	16	0	16
3SIU_F	-	0.53	0.63	0.50	5	135	5	2	3	0	3
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.58	0.64	7	143	4	0	4	0	5
3TRZ_Z	-	-0.05	0.00	0.00	0	88	4	0	4	0	5
3TS2_V	-	-0.05	0.00	0.00	0	102	7	0	6	1	5
3U4M_B	-	0.74	0.77	0.71	17	1252	10	1	6	3	5
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	1	0	0	1	0
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.26	0.23	9	2756	33	6	25	2	26
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.38	0.15	3	1171	26	9	8	9	5
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.36	0.43	0.33	3	211	8	0	6	2	4
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.73	0.85	11	459	4	0	2	2	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.33	0.38	5	483	11	0	8	3	10
4FNJ_A	-	0.91	0.92	0.92	11	238	1	0	1	0	1
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.38	0.35	9	1176	17	3	14	0	15
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.09	0.11	0.10	3	1818	28	2	25	1	25
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]