CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.691 > 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.742 ± 0.154 > 0.654 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.682 > 0.619
Positive Predictive Value 0.711 < 0.727
Total TP 217 > 197
Total TN 17407 < 17441
Total FP 99 > 92
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 14
Total FP INCONS 70 > 60
Total FP COMP 11 < 18
Total FN 101 < 121
P-value 7.39512130982e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 217
Total TN 17407
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.742 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.682
Positive Predictive Value 0.711
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 0.71 0.75 0.68 15 1090 8 2 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.69 0.71 24 2762 11 5 5 1 11
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 197
Total TN 17441
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 121
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.619
Positive Predictive Value 0.727
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.