CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.652 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.161 > 0.541 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.633 > 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.683 < 0.804
Total TP 252 > 148
Total TN 25397 < 25582
Total FP 144 > 41
Total FP CONTRA 36 > 2
Total FP INCONS 81 > 34
Total FP COMP 27 > 5
Total FN 146 < 250
P-value 2.54914456376e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 252
Total TN 25397
Total FP 144
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 81
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 146
Total Scores
MCC 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.683
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 148
Total TN 25582
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 250
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.804
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 771 2 0 2 0 6
2L1F_A 0.83 0.78 0.90 18 743 2 0 2 0 5
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 2 0 0 2 7
2XXA_G 0.41 0.17 1.00 6 2039 0 0 0 0 29
3O58_3 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 4758 1 0 0 1 16
3PDR_A 0.53 0.28 1.00 14 4826 0 0 0 0 36
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
3W3S_B 0.45 0.27 0.75 9 1977 3 0 3 0 24
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 3 1190 9 0 9 0 21
4FRN_A 0.66 0.50 0.88 14 1832 2 1 1 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.