CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RDfolder
MCC 0.783 > 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.776 ± 0.074 > 0.683 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.763 > 0.618
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.709
Total TP 589 > 477
Total TN 30537 < 30587
Total FP 178 < 222
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 46
Total FP INCONS 94 < 150
Total FP COMP 44 > 26
Total FN 183 < 295
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 589
Total TN 30537
Total FP 178
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.783
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.776 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.763
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 52

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 211 2 2 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 477
Total TN 30587
Total FP 222
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 150
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 295
Total Scores
MCC 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.618
Positive Predictive Value 0.709
Nr of predictions 52

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 357 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 4 0 0 4 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 750 13 2 11 0 23
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1813 22 10 12 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2Y9C_V - 0.68 0.67 0.71 12 889 7 0 5 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.57 0.57 0.57 4 537 5 0 3 2 3
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3AKZ_H 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1106 12 1 9 2 9
3AM1_B - 0.52 0.52 0.54 15 1438 13 4 9 0 14
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 302 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 887 4 2 1 1 6
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.