CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.725 > 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.188 > 0.638 ± 0.247
Sensitivity 0.712 > 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.747 < 0.836
Total TP 136 > 102
Total TN 11409 < 11469
Total FP 58 > 27
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 5
Total FP INCONS 33 > 15
Total FP COMP 12 > 7
Total FN 55 < 89
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 11409
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 55
Total Scores
MCC 0.725
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.752 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.747
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 102
Total TN 11469
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 89
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.638 ± 0.247
Sensitivity 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.836
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.