CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.711 > 0.694
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.112 > 0.634 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.714 > 0.611
Positive Predictive Value 0.717 < 0.797
Total TP 354 > 303
Total TN 36371 < 36485
Total FP 191 > 113
Total FP CONTRA 46 > 26
Total FP INCONS 94 > 51
Total FP COMP 51 > 36
Total FN 142 < 193
P-value 1.89611862146e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 354
Total TN 36371
Total FP 191
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 142
Total Scores
MCC 0.711
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.714
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 0.71 0.75 0.68 15 1090 8 2 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.69 0.71 24 2762 11 5 5 1 11
3ZND_W 0.56 0.75 0.43 6 1177 18 5 3 10 2
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 303
Total TN 36485
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 193
Total Scores
MCC 0.694
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.611
Positive Predictive Value 0.797
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.