CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.699 > 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.244 > 0.685 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.653 > 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.762 < 0.778
Total TP 115 > 112
Total TN 7386 < 7393
Total FP 38 > 34
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 9
Total FP INCONS 22 < 23
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 61 < 64
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 7386
Total FP 38
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.653
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 7393
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 64
Total Scores
MCC 0.697
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.