CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold Afold
MCC 0.652 > 0.630
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.775 ± 0.083 > 0.762 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.689 > 0.669
Positive Predictive Value 0.618 > 0.596
Total TP 1141 > 1108
Total TN 538428 > 538414
Total FP 873 < 929
Total FP CONTRA 238 < 241
Total FP INCONS 466 < 510
Total FP COMP 169 < 178
Total FN 515 < 548
P-value 4.1569883686e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of Fold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Afold).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1141
Total TN 538428
Total FP 873
Total FP CONTRA 238
Total FP INCONS 466
Total FP COMP 169
Total FN 515
Total Scores
MCC 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.775 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.618
Nr of predictions 67

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 281 0 0 0 0 1
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 142 0 0 0 0 1
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 767 2 0 2 0 2
2L1F_A 0.91 0.91 0.91 21 740 2 0 2 0 2
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.90 0.90 0.90 26 2411 10 0 3 7 3
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 2010 1 0 0 1 0
2YIE_X - 0.39 0.43 0.38 3 536 8 1 4 3 4
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 2 0 0 2 0
3AM1_B - 0.86 0.86 0.86 25 1437 4 0 4 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22345 95 40 38 17 34
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 507 12 2 10 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_h - 0.93 0.88 1.00 28 2112 2 0 0 2 4
3J2C_O - 0.71 0.76 0.67 31 3941 21 5 10 6 10
3NDB_M - 1.00 1.00 1.00 44 3670 4 0 0 4 0
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 4 7 0 11
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 207 11 6 3 2 3
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3O58_2 0.86 0.87 0.84 27 2722 12 0 5 7 4
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_H - 0.26 0.37 0.19 7 3588 30 19 11 0 12
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8249 57 20 35 2 34
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 8 0 2 6 5
3ZEX_B - 0.32 0.36 0.29 123 420926 346 87 216 43 223
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 908 11 2 4 5 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1108
Total TN 538414
Total FP 929
Total FP CONTRA 241
Total FP INCONS 510
Total FP COMP 178
Total FN 548
Total Scores
MCC 0.630
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.669
Positive Predictive Value 0.596
Nr of predictions 67

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 280 0 0 0 0 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 141 0 0 0 0 0
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 0.98 1.00 0.96 24 766 1 0 1 0 0
2L1F_A 0.98 1.00 0.96 23 739 1 0 1 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 8 0 0 8 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 197 2 0 1 1 2
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 8 1 3 4 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 16 6 9 1 8
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3AKZ_H 0.19 0.20 0.21 4 1108 17 4 11 2 16
3AM1_B - 0.79 0.79 0.79 23 1437 6 0 6 0 6
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 1 14 0 10
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 5 1 1 3 6
3J2C_O - 0.70 0.68 0.72 28 3948 18 3 8 7 13
3NDB_M - 1.00 1.00 1.00 44 3670 4 0 0 4 0
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NMU_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 208 10 5 3 2 3
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3OVS_D - 0.82 0.83 0.83 10 204 2 0 2 0 2
3P22_G - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 301 1 0 1 0 1
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
3ZEX_H - 0.25 0.37 0.18 7 3586 33 20 12 1 12
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8251 55 17 36 2 34
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.77 0.87 27 2765 8 0 4 4 8
3ZEX_B - 0.34 0.38 0.31 132 420926 337 77 217 43 214
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 908 12 2 4 6 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4FNJ_A - 0.86 0.83 0.91 10 239 1 0 1 0 2
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 1 0 0 1 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.