CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.662 > 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.109 > 0.582 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.693 > 0.569
Positive Predictive Value 0.638 < 0.706
Total TP 580 > 476
Total TN 90569 < 90804
Total FP 479 > 273
Total FP CONTRA 99 > 73
Total FP INCONS 230 > 125
Total FP COMP 150 > 75
Total FN 257 < 361
P-value 3.85233844192e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 580
Total TN 90569
Total FP 479
Total FP CONTRA 99
Total FP INCONS 230
Total FP COMP 150
Total FN 257
Total Scores
MCC 0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.638
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 2010 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.47 0.53 0.43 10 945 13 5 8 0 9
3J3E_7 0.59 0.59 0.61 20 2708 15 2 11 2 14
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 34 5 18 11 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 41 12 12 17 11
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3O58_2 0.86 0.87 0.84 27 2722 12 0 5 7 4
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 8 0 2 6 5
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.34 0.23 10 5330 46 9 25 12 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4FRG_B 0.22 0.25 0.23 6 1176 20 7 13 0 18

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 476
Total TN 90804
Total FP 273
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 125
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 361
Total Scores
MCC 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.569
Positive Predictive Value 0.706
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.