CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.760 > 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.083 > 0.750 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.747 > 0.628
Positive Predictive Value 0.777 < 0.794
Total TP 723 > 608
Total TN 100524 < 100688
Total FP 322 > 230
Total FP CONTRA 66 > 43
Total FP INCONS 141 > 115
Total FP COMP 115 > 72
Total FN 245 < 360
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 723
Total TN 100524
Total FP 322
Total FP CONTRA 66
Total FP INCONS 141
Total FP COMP 115
Total FN 245
Total Scores
MCC 0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.783 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.747
Positive Predictive Value 0.777
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.86 0.89 25 2412 9 0 3 6 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 3 0 0 3 0
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 512 7 1 6 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_h - 0.90 0.81 1.00 26 2114 2 0 0 2 6
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.74 0.71 71 39825 58 13 16 29 25
3J2C_O - 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 3948 4 0 0 4 2
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
3ZEX_G - 0.89 0.91 0.87 41 6460 18 5 1 12 4
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8256 53 19 29 5 34
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 608
Total TN 100688
Total FP 230
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 115
Total FP COMP 72
Total FN 360
Total Scores
MCC 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.750 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.628
Positive Predictive Value 0.794
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.84 0.73 1.00 8 154 0 0 0 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2436 4 0 4 0 29
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 0 0 0 0 0
2YIE_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 594 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J0L_7 - 0.83 0.70 1.00 7 512 1 0 0 1 3
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 176 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_2 - 0.55 0.31 1.00 8 2242 0 0 0 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.88 0.84 0.93 27 2111 4 0 2 2 5
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.41 0.52 0.34 11 1187 22 7 14 1 10
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2C_M - 0.51 0.31 0.83 30 39889 12 0 6 6 66
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3987 0 0 0 0 41
3J2L_3 0.94 0.94 0.94 32 2986 8 0 2 6 2
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 144 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.83 0.91 29 2764 8 0 3 5 6
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 10 0 0 10 3
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8273 33 9 22 2 34
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 7 0 6 1 8
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.