CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Mastr(20)
MCC 0.712 > 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.119 > 0.523 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.678 > 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.756 < 0.779
Total TP 238 > 173
Total TN 27648 < 27741
Total FP 105 > 63
Total FP CONTRA 18 > 9
Total FP INCONS 59 > 40
Total FP COMP 28 > 14
Total FN 113 < 178
P-value 1.89649746203e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 238
Total TN 27648
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.756
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 173
Total TN 27741
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 178
Total Scores
MCC 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.779
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3J20_1 0.26 0.25 0.29 5 1095 12 1 11 0 15
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.42 0.38 0.48 13 2993 16 2 12 2 21
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 7 0 2 5 3
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.