CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.721 > 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.100 > 0.140 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.708 > 0.346
Positive Predictive Value 0.736 > 0.662
Total TP 754 > 369
Total TN 474221 < 474688
Total FP 403 > 256
Total FP CONTRA 69 > 35
Total FP INCONS 201 > 153
Total FP COMP 133 > 68
Total FN 311 < 696
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 754
Total TN 474221
Total FP 403
Total FP CONTRA 69
Total FP INCONS 201
Total FP COMP 133
Total FN 311
Total Scores
MCC 0.721
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.708
Positive Predictive Value 0.736
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_2 0.75 0.74 0.76 305 421966 159 17 80 62 107
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3E_7 0.60 0.56 0.66 19 2712 11 1 9 1 15
3J3F_7 0.81 0.83 0.79 30 2896 10 1 7 2 6
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4JF2_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 1058 1 1 0 0 1

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 369
Total TN 474688
Total FP 256
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 153
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 696
Total Scores
MCC 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.140 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.346
Positive Predictive Value 0.662
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3J20_1 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 5 0 4 1 20
3J20_2 0.77 0.76 0.78 312 421966 152 18 72 62 100
3J20_0 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 4 0 4 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3015 5 0 5 0 34
3J3D_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 964 4 1 3 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3E_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2733 8 1 7 0 34
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2930 4 1 3 0 36
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 5 3 1 1 17
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16
3W1K_J 0.57 0.35 0.92 11 1666 1 0 1 0 20
3W3S_B 0.45 0.36 0.57 12 1968 10 1 8 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.13 0.07 0.25 2 5366 6 2 4 0 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2794 2 0 2 0 35
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 4 0 2 2 8
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12
4FRG_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1200 2 0 2 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1845 3 0 3 0 28
4JF2_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1078 4 0 4 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.