CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Sfold
MCC 0.675 > 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.082 > 0.705 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.645 > 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.707 > 0.603
Total TP 1168 > 1100
Total TN 954095 > 953922
Total FP 688 < 966
Total FP CONTRA 125 < 191
Total FP INCONS 358 < 533
Total FP COMP 205 < 242
Total FN 643 < 711
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Sfold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1168
Total TN 954095
Total FP 688
Total FP CONTRA 125
Total FP INCONS 358
Total FP COMP 205
Total FN 643
Total Scores
MCC 0.675
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.645
Positive Predictive Value 0.707
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.86 0.89 25 2412 9 0 3 6 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 3 0 0 3 0
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_h - 0.90 0.81 1.00 26 2114 2 0 0 2 6
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 512 7 1 6 0 10
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_2 0.75 0.74 0.76 305 421966 159 17 80 62 107
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.74 0.71 71 39825 58 13 16 29 25
3J2C_O - 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 3948 4 0 0 4 2
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 9 0 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.89 0.91 0.87 41 6460 18 5 1 12 4
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8256 53 19 29 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
3ZEX_B - 0.33 0.27 0.40 95 421115 160 26 116 18 251
3ZEX_H - 0.28 0.37 0.22 7 3593 25 15 10 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.49 0.57 0.44 4 211 6 0 5 1 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1100
Total TN 953922
Total FP 966
Total FP CONTRA 191
Total FP INCONS 533
Total FP COMP 242
Total FN 711
Total Scores
MCC 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.705 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.603
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 26 2414 6 0 0 6 3
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 1 0 0 1 0
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 540 0 0 0 0 3
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 5 1 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.44 0.42 0.48 11 2227 19 0 12 7 15
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 4 1 1 2 6
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 516 3 1 2 0 10
3J16_L 0.34 0.33 0.37 7 1140 12 0 12 0 14
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_2 0.57 0.58 0.56 240 421940 241 31 157 53 172
3J2C_M - 0.85 0.85 0.85 82 39828 51 6 9 36 14
3J2C_O - 0.76 0.66 0.87 27 3956 9 2 2 5 14
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.60 0.50 0.73 8 1282 7 3 0 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.63 0.64 0.64 21 1956 13 4 8 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 7 0 0 7 4
3ZEX_G - 0.99 0.98 1.00 44 6463 15 0 0 15 1
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8250 56 20 34 2 34
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.80 0.90 28 2765 8 0 3 5 7
3ZEX_B - 0.37 0.39 0.35 136 420960 296 65 191 40 210
3ZEX_H - 0.26 0.37 0.19 7 3589 29 18 11 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.34 0.50 10 5354 27 2 8 17 19
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.37 0.14 1.00 1 219 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.67 0.58 0.78 14 1184 4 3 1 0 10
4FRN_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 16 1830 2 2 0 0 12
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.