CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.650 > 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.159 > 0.609 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.590 = 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 > 0.670
Total TP 144 = 144
Total TN 19634 > 19618
Total FP 70 < 90
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 20
Total FP INCONS 41 < 51
Total FP COMP 15 < 19
Total FN 100 = 100
P-value 1.35010831363e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 144
Total TN 19634
Total FP 70
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 100
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 144
Total TN 19618
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 100
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.670
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.