CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot UNAFold
MCC 0.675 > 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.082 > 0.677 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.645 > 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.707 > 0.554
Total TP 1168 > 1087
Total TN 954095 > 953783
Total FP 688 < 1124
Total FP CONTRA 125 < 234
Total FP INCONS 358 < 642
Total FP COMP 205 < 248
Total FN 643 < 724
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1168
Total TN 954095
Total FP 688
Total FP CONTRA 125
Total FP INCONS 358
Total FP COMP 205
Total FN 643
Total Scores
MCC 0.675
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.748 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.645
Positive Predictive Value 0.707
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.88 0.86 0.89 25 2412 9 0 3 6 4
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 3 0 0 3 0
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_h - 0.90 0.81 1.00 26 2114 2 0 0 2 6
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 512 7 1 6 0 10
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_2 0.75 0.74 0.76 305 421966 159 17 80 62 107
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.74 0.71 71 39825 58 13 16 29 25
3J2C_O - 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 3948 4 0 0 4 2
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 9 0 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.89 0.91 0.87 41 6460 18 5 1 12 4
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8256 53 19 29 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
3ZEX_B - 0.33 0.27 0.40 95 421115 160 26 116 18 251
3ZEX_H - 0.28 0.37 0.22 7 3593 25 15 10 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.49 0.57 0.44 4 211 6 0 5 1 3
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1087
Total TN 953783
Total FP 1124
Total FP CONTRA 234
Total FP INCONS 642
Total FP COMP 248
Total FN 724
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.677 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.554
Nr of predictions 57

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 152 0 0 0 0 1
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 6 0 0 6 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 6 1 3 2 3
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.30 0.31 0.31 8 2224 25 2 16 7 18
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 4 0 2 2 4
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 4 1 1 2 6
3J0L_7 - 0.66 0.70 0.64 7 508 5 2 2 1 3
3J16_L 0.31 0.33 0.30 7 1136 16 3 13 0 14
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_2 0.57 0.58 0.55 240 421931 250 36 161 53 172
3J2C_M - 0.75 0.80 0.71 77 39816 68 13 19 36 19
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.61 0.60 25 3945 22 7 10 5 16
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.49 0.50 0.50 8 1277 15 0 8 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 908 11 2 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.97 0.93 1.00 42 6465 17 0 0 17 3
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8255 54 17 32 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 6 0 2 4 6
3ZEX_B - 0.36 0.40 0.33 138 420935 317 72 207 38 208
3ZEX_H - 0.25 0.37 0.18 7 3586 32 20 12 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.48 0.46 0.52 13 1823 12 2 10 0 15
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.