CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.550 > 0.495
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.099 > 0.551 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.586 > 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.528 > 0.503
Total TP 577 > 493
Total TN 70910 < 71022
Total FP 684 > 610
Total FP CONTRA 129 < 131
Total FP INCONS 386 > 356
Total FP COMP 169 > 123
Total FN 407 < 491
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 577
Total TN 70910
Total FP 684
Total FP CONTRA 129
Total FP INCONS 386
Total FP COMP 169
Total FN 407
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.586
Positive Predictive Value 0.528
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 152 0 0 0 0 1
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 11 0 0 11 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 3 0 0 3 0
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 422 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 196 2 0 0 2 0
2M58_A - 0.22 0.25 0.23 3 531 13 1 9 3 9
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 535 15 1 8 6 7
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 8 2 4 2 3
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.27 0.25 7 2222 29 4 17 8 19
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3J0L_1 - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 472 5 0 1 4 2
3J0L_h - 0.98 0.97 1.00 31 2109 2 0 0 2 1
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 504 15 6 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 170 7 4 2 1 2
3J16_L 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1136 12 4 7 1 9
3J20_0 0.66 0.71 0.63 15 1195 11 3 6 2 6
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 15 1 8 6 7
3J3D_C 0.54 0.63 0.48 12 943 13 4 9 0 7
3J3E_7 0.55 0.56 0.54 19 2706 23 1 15 7 15
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3F_7 0.88 0.89 0.86 32 2897 9 1 4 4 4
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3SIU_F - 0.53 0.63 0.50 5 135 5 2 3 0 3
3SN2_B 0.58 0.58 0.64 7 143 4 0 4 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 88 4 0 4 0 5
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 102 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6493 14 6 8 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.23 0.26 0.23 9 2756 33 6 25 2 26
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.32 0.16 6 3588 36 15 16 5 13
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 909 22 0 5 17 4
3ZND_W 0.23 0.38 0.15 3 1171 26 9 8 9 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 8 0 6 2 4
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.92 0.92 11 238 1 0 1 0 1
4FRG_B 0.35 0.38 0.35 9 1176 17 3 14 0 15
4FRN_A 0.09 0.11 0.10 3 1818 28 2 25 1 25
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.74 0.75 0.75 18 1058 7 1 5 1 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.29 0.23 5 600 17 0 17 0 12

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 493
Total TN 71022
Total FP 610
Total FP CONTRA 131
Total FP INCONS 356
Total FP COMP 123
Total FN 491
Total Scores
MCC 0.495
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.551 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 176 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.88 23 2414 11 0 3 8 6
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 423 0 0 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.48 0.45 0.56 5 198 5 0 4 1 6
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 536 11 1 7 3 7
2YIE_Z - 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 594 7 1 2 4 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_2 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 4 2223 26 4 19 3 22
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J0L_h - 0.47 0.41 0.57 13 2117 12 1 9 2 19
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.20 0.21 9 6465 37 13 20 4 36
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_H - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3593 33 17 15 1 19
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 17 0 4 13 4
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 213 7 4 3 0 7
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FNJ_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 243 7 0 7 0 12
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.