CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) Afold
MCC 0.746 > 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.096 > 0.686 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.715 > 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.783 > 0.626
Total TP 378 > 348
Total TN 63813 > 63740
Total FP 245 < 336
Total FP CONTRA 44 < 64
Total FP INCONS 61 < 144
Total FP COMP 140 > 128
Total FN 151 < 181
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 378
Total TN 63813
Total FP 245
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 140
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.715
Positive Predictive Value 0.783
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2012 4 0 3 1 5
3A2K_C 0.74 0.73 0.76 16 1087 6 1 4 1 6
3G4S_9 0.78 0.77 0.80 20 2711 16 2 3 11 6
3IVN_B 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 884 2 2 0 0 6
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.54 0.63 51 25455 35 18 12 5 44
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 12 0 5 7 4
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 32 5 2 25 2
3JYX_3 0.73 0.73 0.73 11 2363 26 0 4 22 4
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 9 2 4 3 10
3O58_3 0.62 0.59 0.65 13 4744 18 5 2 11 9
3O58_2 0.92 0.90 0.93 28 2724 13 0 2 11 3
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 348
Total TN 63740
Total FP 336
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 144
Total FP COMP 128
Total FN 181
Total Scores
MCC 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.626
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3G4S_9 0.73 0.69 0.78 18 2713 13 2 3 8 8
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 29 0 6 23 5
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.77 0.87 27 2765 8 0 4 4 8
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.