CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.755 > 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.067 > 0.679 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.720 > 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.796 > 0.654
Total TP 645 > 610
Total TN 92052 > 91929
Total FP 335 < 460
Total FP CONTRA 65 < 106
Total FP INCONS 100 < 217
Total FP COMP 170 > 137
Total FN 251 < 286
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 645
Total TN 92052
Total FP 335
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 170
Total FN 251
Total Scores
MCC 0.755
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.762 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.720
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2012 4 0 3 1 5
3A2K_C 0.74 0.73 0.76 16 1087 6 1 4 1 6
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3G4S_9 0.78 0.77 0.80 20 2711 16 2 3 11 6
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 6 2 2 2 6
3IVN_B 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 884 2 2 0 0 6
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.54 0.63 51 25455 35 18 12 5 44
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 12 0 5 7 4
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.67 0.65 0.71 22 2989 11 3 6 2 12
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 32 5 2 25 2
3JYX_3 0.73 0.73 0.73 11 2363 26 0 4 22 4
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 9 2 4 3 10
3O58_2 0.92 0.90 0.93 28 2724 13 0 2 11 3
3O58_3 0.62 0.59 0.65 13 4744 18 5 2 11 9
3PDR_A 0.85 0.82 0.89 41 4794 9 2 3 4 9
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.41 9 5352 15 3 10 2 20
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 610
Total TN 91929
Total FP 460
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 217
Total FP COMP 137
Total FN 286
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.654
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.86 0.86 18 1108 4 0 3 1 3
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.12 4 2012 30 2 27 1 31
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3AMU_B 0.75 0.79 0.71 15 1136 9 0 6 3 4
3G4S_9 0.45 0.50 0.42 13 2705 24 6 12 6 13
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.57 0.58 0.57 55 25440 49 18 23 8 40
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 11 0 5 6 3
3J20_0 0.53 0.57 0.50 12 1195 13 3 9 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 5 0 0 5 0
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 16 1 9 6 8
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3JYX_4 0.39 0.58 0.27 7 4730 35 13 6 16 5
3JYX_3 0.33 0.47 0.24 7 2349 24 16 6 2 8
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2243 9 1 3 5 6
3O58_2 0.92 0.94 0.91 29 2722 10 0 3 7 2
3O58_3 0.32 0.36 0.29 8 4736 21 7 13 1 14
3PDR_A 0.83 0.86 0.80 43 4786 13 5 6 2 7
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.34 0.37 10 5347 23 4 13 6 19
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
4A1C_3 0.81 0.81 0.81 30 2726 10 0 7 3 7
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.73 0.71 0.77 17 1180 5 3 2 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.