CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.707 > 0.046
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.143 > 0.018 ± 0.027
Sensitivity 0.667 > 0.009
Positive Predictive Value 0.757 > 0.273
Total TP 234 > 3
Total TN 27654 < 27952
Total FP 121 > 47
Total FP CONTRA 25 > 0
Total FP INCONS 50 > 8
Total FP COMP 46 > 39
Total FN 117 < 348
P-value 2.57237423209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 27654
Total FP 121
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.707
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.667
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.67 0.65 0.71 22 2989 11 3 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.41 9 5352 15 3 10 2 20
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3
Total TN 27952
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 348
Total Scores
MCC 0.046
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.018 ± 0.027
Sensitivity 0.009
Positive Predictive Value 0.273
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.