CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) ProbKnot
MCC 0.736 > 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.730 ± 0.089 > 0.685 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.697 < 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.782 > 0.664
Total TP 492 < 494
Total TN 75512 > 75397
Total FP 230 < 353
Total FP CONTRA 52 < 72
Total FP INCONS 85 < 178
Total FP COMP 93 < 103
Total FN 214 > 212
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 492
Total TN 75512
Total FP 230
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 214
Total Scores
MCC 0.736
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.730 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.697
Positive Predictive Value 0.782
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2012 4 0 3 1 5
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.54 0.63 51 25455 35 18 12 5 44
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 12 0 5 7 4
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.67 0.65 0.71 22 2989 11 3 6 2 12
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 9 2 4 3 10
3O58_3 0.62 0.59 0.65 13 4744 18 5 2 11 9
3O58_2 0.92 0.90 0.93 28 2724 13 0 2 11 3
3PDR_A 0.85 0.82 0.89 41 4794 9 2 3 4 9
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.41 9 5352 15 3 10 2 20
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 494
Total TN 75397
Total FP 353
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 178
Total FP COMP 103
Total FN 212
Total Scores
MCC 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.700
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1108 2 0 0 2 0
2XXA_G 0.25 0.26 0.26 9 2011 26 1 24 1 26
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3IZF_C 0.90 0.91 0.89 32 2604 7 0 4 3 3
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 8 0 5 3 5
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 0 6 5 8
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3O58_2 0.91 0.94 0.88 29 2721 10 0 4 6 2
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 7 0 2 5 5
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.