CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.670 > 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.171 < 0.657 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.627 > 0.616
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 > 0.662
Total TP 175 > 172
Total TN 24165 > 24147
Total FP 109 < 121
Total FP CONTRA 19 < 31
Total FP INCONS 48 < 57
Total FP COMP 42 > 33
Total FN 104 < 107
P-value 5.89166989468e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 175
Total TN 24165
Total FP 109
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.627
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.67 0.65 0.71 22 2989 11 3 6 2 12
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.41 9 5352 15 3 10 2 20
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 172
Total TN 24147
Total FP 121
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.616
Positive Predictive Value 0.662
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.