CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.718 > 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.690 ± 0.114 > 0.460 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.699 > 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.743 > 0.434
Total TP 356 > 231
Total TN 45477 > 45424
Total FP 223 < 374
Total FP CONTRA 45 < 77
Total FP INCONS 78 < 224
Total FP COMP 100 > 73
Total FN 153 < 278
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 356
Total TN 45477
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 100
Total FN 153
Total Scores
MCC 0.718
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.690 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.699
Positive Predictive Value 0.743
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1138 3 0 0 3 0
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J20_0 0.93 0.90 0.95 19 1199 1 1 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.67 0.65 0.71 22 2989 11 3 6 2 12
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 15 4 6 5 12
3J3E_7 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2705 14 1 7 6 6
3J3F_8 0.48 0.53 0.43 10 4738 29 7 6 16 9
3J3F_7 0.82 0.83 0.81 30 2897 12 1 6 5 6
3J3V_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 27 2629 12 0 0 12 0
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2763 13 0 4 9 6
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.41 9 5352 15 3 10 2 20
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 1183 6 2 3 1 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 231
Total TN 45424
Total FP 374
Total FP CONTRA 77
Total FP INCONS 224
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 278
Total Scores
MCC 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.460 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.434
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.