CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.776 > 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.300 > 0.662 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.737 > 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.824 < 0.831
Total TP 84 > 59
Total TN 8135 < 8166
Total FP 31 > 16
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 3
Total FP INCONS 14 > 9
Total FP COMP 13 > 4
Total FN 30 < 55
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 84
Total TN 8135
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 30
Total Scores
MCC 0.776
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.300
Sensitivity 0.737
Positive Predictive Value 0.824
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 1 5 5 8
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 59
Total TN 8166
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 55
Total Scores
MCC 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.831
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1202 2 1 0 1 5
3J2L_3 0.57 0.50 0.65 17 2994 11 2 7 2 17
3ZEX_D 0.70 0.54 0.90 19 2775 3 0 2 1 16
4FRG_B 0.54 0.29 1.00 7 1195 0 0 0 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.