CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.705 > 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.248 < 0.646 ± 0.263
Sensitivity 0.660 > 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.761 > 0.649
Total TP 134 > 133
Total TN 13885 > 13856
Total FP 65 < 98
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 21
Total FP INCONS 31 < 51
Total FP COMP 23 < 26
Total FN 69 < 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 13885
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 69
Total Scores
MCC 0.705
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.660
Positive Predictive Value 0.761
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3AMU_B 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1139 2 0 0 2 1
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 13856
Total FP 98
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.263
Sensitivity 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1138 0 0 0 0 0
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 7 0 5 2 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.