CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) Fold
MCC 0.774 > 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.732 ± 0.078 > 0.729 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.739 > 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.812 > 0.640
Total TP 1079 > 1007
Total TN 532516 > 532271
Total FP 476 < 768
Total FP CONTRA 79 < 146
Total FP INCONS 171 < 421
Total FP COMP 226 > 201
Total FN 382 < 454
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1079
Total TN 532516
Total FP 476
Total FP CONTRA 79
Total FP INCONS 171
Total FP COMP 226
Total FN 382
Total Scores
MCC 0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.732 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.739
Positive Predictive Value 0.812
Nr of predictions 40

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 449 1 0 1 0 2
2KUU_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 430 2 0 1 1 2
2KUV_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 421 1 0 1 0 2
2KUW_A 0.78 0.72 0.87 13 455 3 0 2 1 5
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 369 2 0 2 0 16
2L1F_A 0.93 0.91 0.95 21 741 1 0 1 0 2
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 768 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.55 0.56 0.59 10 340 8 0 7 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
2WWQ_V 0.70 0.68 0.72 13 1186 7 0 5 2 6
2XKV_B 0.78 0.82 0.75 9 1823 20 0 3 17 2
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.81 0.89 17 1110 3 0 2 1 4
2XXA_G 0.74 0.69 0.80 24 2015 7 0 6 1 11
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1139 2 0 0 2 1
3IYQ_A 0.44 0.47 0.41 24 22382 49 21 13 15 27
3IZ4_A 0.73 0.64 0.82 61 25462 22 12 1 9 34
3IZF_C 0.84 0.83 0.85 29 2606 11 0 5 6 6
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J20_2 0.83 0.82 0.84 337 421969 147 14 48 85 75
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 1 5 5 8
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 26 2247 10 2 3 5 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 11 0 2 9 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 20 5 3 12 11
3PDR_A 0.87 0.88 0.86 44 4789 10 4 3 3 6
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 21 3 6 12 20
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14
4FRN_A 0.70 0.68 0.73 19 1822 7 3 4 0 9

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1007
Total TN 532271
Total FP 768
Total FP CONTRA 146
Total FP INCONS 421
Total FP COMP 201
Total FN 454
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.729 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.640
Nr of predictions 40

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 0.91 0.91 0.91 21 740 2 0 2 0 2
2L1F_B 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 767 2 0 2 0 2
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2WWQ_V 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1186 3 0 0 3 1
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 2010 1 0 0 1 0
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 2 0 0 2 0
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22345 95 40 38 17 34
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3IZF_C 0.87 0.89 0.86 31 2604 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1138 5 0 5 0 5
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_2 0.55 0.58 0.53 239 421918 270 31 180 59 173
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_2 0.86 0.87 0.84 27 2722 12 0 5 7 4
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 8 0 0 8 0
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.34 0.23 10 5330 46 9 25 12 19
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 8 0 2 6 5
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4FRG_B 0.22 0.25 0.23 6 1176 20 7 13 0 18
4FRN_A 0.46 0.46 0.46 13 1820 15 7 8 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.