CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) MaxExpect
MCC 0.781 > 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.066 > 0.725 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.746 > 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.819 > 0.664
Total TP 1218 > 1126
Total TN 546636 > 546427
Total FP 547 < 813
Total FP CONTRA 90 < 148
Total FP INCONS 179 < 422
Total FP COMP 278 > 243
Total FN 415 < 507
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  2. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1218
Total TN 546636
Total FP 547
Total FP CONTRA 90
Total FP INCONS 179
Total FP COMP 278
Total FN 415
Total Scores
MCC 0.781
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.746
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 450 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 449 1 0 1 0 2
2KUU_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 430 2 0 1 1 2
2KUV_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 421 1 0 1 0 2
2KUW_A 0.78 0.72 0.87 13 455 3 0 2 1 5
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 369 2 0 2 0 16
2L1F_A 0.93 0.91 0.95 21 741 1 0 1 0 2
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 768 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.55 0.56 0.59 10 340 8 0 7 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2WWQ_V 0.70 0.68 0.72 13 1186 7 0 5 2 6
2XKV_B 0.78 0.82 0.75 9 1823 20 0 3 17 2
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.81 0.89 17 1110 3 0 2 1 4
2XXA_G 0.74 0.69 0.80 24 2015 7 0 6 1 11
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1139 2 0 0 2 1
3GX2_A 0.83 0.82 0.85 23 1422 7 2 2 3 5
3IVN_B 0.69 0.57 0.87 13 888 2 2 0 0 10
3IYQ_A 0.44 0.47 0.41 24 22382 49 21 13 15 27
3IZ4_A 0.73 0.64 0.82 61 25462 22 12 1 9 34
3IZF_C 0.84 0.83 0.85 29 2606 11 0 5 6 6
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J20_2 0.83 0.82 0.84 337 421969 147 14 48 85 75
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 1 5 5 8
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 24 0 4 20 3
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 21 6 1 14 2
3LA5_A 0.82 0.72 0.95 18 935 1 1 0 0 7
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 26 2247 10 2 3 5 11
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 20 5 3 12 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 11 0 2 9 2
3PDR_A 0.87 0.88 0.86 44 4789 10 4 3 3 6
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 21 3 6 12 20
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14
4FRN_A 0.70 0.68 0.73 19 1822 7 3 4 0 9

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1126
Total TN 546427
Total FP 813
Total FP CONTRA 148
Total FP INCONS 422
Total FP COMP 243
Total FN 507
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.725 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.690
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 452 2 0 1 1 1
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 14 0 0 14 1
2WWQ_V 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1186 3 0 0 3 1
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.24 0.26 0.25 9 2009 28 1 26 1 26
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3AKZ_H 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1107 2 0 0 2 0
3AMU_B 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 1135 10 0 7 3 4
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.17 17 22342 96 41 40 15 34
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.61 0.62 58 25442 42 14 22 6 37
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 8 0 5 3 3
3J16_L 0.34 0.33 0.37 7 1140 12 0 12 0 14
3J20_0 0.53 0.57 0.50 12 1195 13 2 10 1 9
3J20_2 0.60 0.63 0.58 258 421926 239 28 156 55 154
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3JYV_7 0.48 0.45 0.53 9 1094 9 3 5 1 11
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 24 0 4 20 3
3JYX_4 0.55 0.83 0.37 10 4729 34 14 3 17 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 10 0 6 4 10
3O58_3 0.40 0.50 0.33 11 4731 36 8 14 14 11
3O58_2 0.91 0.94 0.88 29 2721 11 0 4 7 2
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 3 5 0 9
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 8 0 0 8 0
3W3S_B 0.97 0.94 1.00 31 1958 1 0 0 1 2
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.77 0.87 27 2765 11 0 4 7 8
3ZEX_C 0.54 0.45 0.65 13 5354 17 2 5 10 16
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 10 17 14 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4FRG_B 0.29 0.25 0.35 6 1185 11 4 7 0 18
4FRN_A 0.51 0.46 0.57 13 1825 10 5 5 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.