CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.753 > 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.700 ± 0.201 > 0.366 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.712 > 0.414
Positive Predictive Value 0.802 > 0.293
Total TP 198 > 115
Total TN 20862 > 20716
Total FP 90 < 305
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 83
Total FP INCONS 41 < 195
Total FP COMP 41 > 27
Total FN 80 < 163
P-value 1.50834591464e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 198
Total TN 20862
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.753
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.700 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_1 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1093 1 0 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 1 5 5 8
3UZL_B 0.83 0.75 0.92 12 1280 8 0 1 7 4
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 0 6 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
4A1C_3 0.92 0.92 0.92 34 2726 6 0 3 3 3
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 20716
Total FP 305
Total FP CONTRA 83
Total FP INCONS 195
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.366 ± 0.135
Sensitivity 0.414
Positive Predictive Value 0.293
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J16_L 0.43 0.52 0.37 11 1129 19 8 11 0 10
3J20_1 0.42 0.50 0.37 10 1085 20 5 12 3 10
3J2L_3 0.13 0.18 0.12 6 2969 46 14 31 1 28
3UZL_B 0.41 0.56 0.31 9 1264 25 10 10 5 7
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
3ZEX_D 0.30 0.37 0.27 13 2747 36 10 26 0 22
4A1C_3 0.58 0.68 0.51 25 2714 24 9 15 0 12
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.