CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Mastr(20)		Afold
MCC	0.664	>	0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.635 ± 0.176	<	0.686 ± 0.134
Sensitivity	0.507	<	0.658
Positive Predictive Value	0.876	>	0.626
Total TP	268	<	348
Total TN	63990	>	63740
Total FP	104	<	336
Total FP CONTRA	5	<	64
Total FP INCONS	33	<	144
Total FP COMP	66	<	128
Total FN	261	>	181
P-value	5.71949088499e-07

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).
Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Afold).

^top

Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	268
Total TN	63990
Total FP	104
Total FP CONTRA	5
Total FP INCONS	33
Total FP COMP	66
Total FN	261

Total Scores
MCC	0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.635 ± 0.176
Sensitivity	0.507
Positive Predictive Value	0.876
Nr of predictions	20

^top

2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	164	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.83	0.94	15	341	2	0	1	1	3
2WRQ_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	1143	13	0	0	13	0
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.20	1.00	7	2038	0	0	0	0	28
3A2K_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.77	0.85	17	1088	3	0	3	0	5
3G4S_9	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.62	0.76	16	2715	10	2	3	5	10
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.83	0.90	19	882	2	2	0	0	4
3IZ4_A	tmRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	25536	0	0	0	0	95
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.91	0.91	32	2605	9	0	3	6	3
3JYV_7	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	1092	2	0	0	2	1
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	4756	0	0	0	0	12
3JYX_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.80	0.75	12	2362	26	0	4	22	3
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.80	1.00	20	934	0	0	0	0	5
3NPB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.30	0.41	11	2251	18	1	15	2	26
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	4764	0	0	0	0	22
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.94	0.94	29	2723	12	0	2	10	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.84	0.71	1.00	17	849	0	0	0	0	7
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.91	0.94	32	2762	7	0	2	5	3
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	4516	0	0	0	0	20
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.20	1.00	3	469	0	0	0	0	12

^top

Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	348
Total TN	63740
Total FP	336
Total FP CONTRA	64
Total FP INCONS	144
Total FP COMP	128
Total FN	181

Total Scores
MCC	0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.686 ± 0.134
Sensitivity	0.658
Positive Predictive Value	0.626
Nr of predictions	20

^top

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	164	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2WRQ_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	1143	14	0	0	14	0
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.34	0.38	12	2013	21	1	19	1	23
3A2K_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.50	0.44	11	1083	14	3	11	0	11
3G4S_9	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.69	0.78	18	2713	13	2	3	8	8
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	19	884	0	0	0	0	4
3IZ4_A	tmRNA links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.57	0.48	54	25423	63	27	32	4	41
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.83	0.86	0.81	30	2603	11	0	7	4	5
3JYV_7	tRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	1088	23	4	19	0	20
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.83	0.45	10	4734	35	10	2	23	2
3JYX_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.67	0.63	10	2362	29	0	6	23	5
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	21	933	0	0	0	0	4
3NPB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.73	0.93	27	2249	6	0	2	4	10
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.50	0.34	11	4732	38	6	15	17	11
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.81	0.81	25	2723	14	0	6	8	6
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.77	0.87	27	2765	8	0	4	4	8
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.25	0.15	5	4483	43	11	17	15	15
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.73	0.92	11	460	3	0	1	2	4

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]