CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.630 > 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.126 < 0.605 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.489 < 0.556
Positive Predictive Value 0.819 > 0.574
Total TP 424 < 482
Total TN 86970 > 86649
Total FP 174 < 449
Total FP CONTRA 16 < 98
Total FP INCONS 78 < 259
Total FP COMP 80 < 92
Total FN 443 > 385
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 424
Total TN 86970
Total FP 174
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 443
Total Scores
MCC 0.630
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.489
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 33

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3A2K_C 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1088 3 0 3 0 5
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3G4S_9 0.68 0.62 0.76 16 2715 10 2 3 5 10
3GX2_A 0.46 0.39 0.55 11 1429 10 2 7 1 17
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25536 0 0 0 0 95
3IZF_C 0.91 0.91 0.91 32 2605 9 0 3 6 3
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 0.26 0.25 0.29 5 1095 12 1 11 0 15
3J2L_3 0.42 0.38 0.48 13 2993 16 2 12 2 21
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 26 0 4 22 3
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.34 0.30 0.41 11 2251 18 1 15 2 26
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 12 0 2 10 2
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 7 0 2 5 3
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 482
Total TN 86649
Total FP 449
Total FP CONTRA 98
Total FP INCONS 259
Total FP COMP 92
Total FN 385
Total Scores
MCC 0.561
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.605 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.556
Positive Predictive Value 0.574
Nr of predictions 33

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 341 1 0 0 1 2
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 13 0 0 13 1
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1808 27 13 14 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1110 1 0 0 1 2
2XXA_G -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 2016 29 1 28 0 35
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3AMU_B 0.73 0.74 0.74 14 1138 8 0 5 3 5
3G4S_9 0.41 0.46 0.38 12 2704 21 10 10 1 14
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 0 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.39 0.39 0.39 37 25441 63 15 43 5 58
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 6 0 4 2 6
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 12 3 6 3 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 16 5 1 10 5
3JYX_4 0.19 0.25 0.15 3 4736 33 9 8 16 9
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.66 0.59 0.73 22 2248 10 0 8 2 15
3O58_3 0.12 0.14 0.11 3 4737 35 8 16 11 19
3O58_2 0.53 0.52 0.55 16 2725 16 3 10 3 15
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.66 0.63 0.71 22 2765 10 4 5 1 13
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.