CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.681 > 0.023
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.163 > 0.008 ± 0.016
Sensitivity 0.671 > 0.003
Positive Predictive Value 0.701 > 0.200
Total TP 216 > 1
Total TN 22281 < 22584
Total FP 118 > 23
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 0
Total FP INCONS 71 > 4
Total FP COMP 26 > 19
Total FN 106 < 321
P-value 9.64686604905e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 216
Total TN 22281
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.701
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1
Total TN 22584
Total FP 23
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 321
Total Scores
MCC 0.023
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.008 ± 0.016
Sensitivity 0.003
Positive Predictive Value 0.200
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.