CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.716 > 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.712 ± 0.156 > 0.582 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.694 > 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.752 > 0.677
Total TP 118 > 88
Total TN 7380 < 7407
Total FP 46 < 47
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 9
Total FP INCONS 29 < 33
Total FP COMP 7 > 5
Total FN 52 < 82
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 7380
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.712 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 88
Total TN 7407
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.677
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.