CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.643 > 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.621 ± 0.136 > 0.474 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.642 > 0.468
Positive Predictive Value 0.652 > 0.462
Total TP 291 > 212
Total TN 37480 > 37467
Total FP 210 < 315
Total FP CONTRA 44 < 58
Total FP INCONS 111 < 189
Total FP COMP 55 < 68
Total FN 162 < 241
P-value 3.76416234106e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 291
Total TN 37480
Total FP 210
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 111
Total FP COMP 55
Total FN 162
Total Scores
MCC 0.643
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.621 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.77 0.76 0.79 26 2708 11 1 6 4 8
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_7 0.52 0.42 0.65 15 2911 9 0 8 1 21
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 212
Total TN 37467
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 189
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 241
Total Scores
MCC 0.458
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.474 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.468
Positive Predictive Value 0.462
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.