CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) Vsfold5
MCC 0.652 > 0.495
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.638 ± 0.177 > 0.563 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.624 > 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.692 > 0.512
Total TP 234 > 185
Total TN 24653 > 24630
Total FP 131 < 206
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 39
Total FP INCONS 81 < 137
Total FP COMP 27 < 30
Total FN 141 < 190
P-value 2.43573297697e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 24653
Total FP 131
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 81
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.638 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.692
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2033 12 2 10 0 35
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 24630
Total FP 206
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.495
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.563 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.512
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 2014 31 2 29 0 35
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J2L_3 0.70 0.71 0.71 24 2986 13 3 7 3 10
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3ZEX_D 0.09 0.09 0.12 3 2771 24 5 17 2 32
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.