CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.672 > 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.349 > 0.625 ± 0.254
Sensitivity 0.615 > 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.671
Total TP 110 > 100
Total TN 8411 > 8409
Total FP 39 < 52
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 14
Total FP INCONS 28 < 35
Total FP COMP 2 < 3
Total FN 69 < 79
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of performance of Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 110
Total TN 8411
Total FP 39
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 69
Total Scores
MCC 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.349
Sensitivity 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 8409
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 79
Total Scores
MCC 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.254
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.671
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.